Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and a group of six other US lawmakers have requested information on the energy usage and potential environmental impact of bitcoin mining operations in the state of Texas.
In a letter to Pablo Vegas, CEO of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), the senators called Texas a “deregulated safe harbor” for crypto mining firms, adding that the state’s “cheap power and laissez-faire regulation” are raising concerns about the potential for mining operations “to add to the stress on the state’s power grid.”
One specific piece of information the senators requested relates to how much electricity crypto mining operators in Texas have consumed and how much carbon dioxide emissions they’ve released over the last five years.
The lawmakers also want to know how much Texas regulators are paying Bitcoin mining companies in subsidies to turn down energy consumption during periods of peak demand.
“In simple terms, the Bitcoin miners make money from mining that produces major strains on the electric grid: and during peak demand when the profitability of continuing to mine decreases, they then collect subsidies in the form of demand response payments when they shut off their mining operations and do nothing,” reads the letter.
Among the companies running a Bitcoin mining business in Texas, the letter cites Riot Blockchain, the operator of a 750 MW facility in Rockdale, which in July this year announced it made around $9.5 million by shutting down operations and selling electricity back to the grid.
The senators noted that this was more than the $5.6 million the company made from actually selling Bitcoin that month.
Texas energy grid and bitcoin mining
The letter further estimates that Texas is responsible for about a quarter of all US-based Bitcoin mining operations, and 9% of the crypto mining computing power worldwide, ”a share that is expected to reach 20% by the end of next year.”
Around 30 crypto mining companies have come to Texas over the past decade, encouraged by vast amounts of open land, easy access to affordable power, and low state taxes, according to a recent report by The Texas Tribune.
The increased demand raised fears that the state’s already fragile electricity grid, which crashed during an extreme winter storm in February 2021, could cripple further.
“Cryptomining is adding significant demand to an already unreliable grid, posing enormous challenges to the transmission and distribution system… and contributing to the global climate crisis,” the lawmakers wrote in the letter.
Bitcoin requires so much computing activity that it eats up more energy than entire countries. One of the easiest and least disruptive things we can do to fight the #ClimateCrisis is to crack down on environmentally wasteful cryptocurrencies. pic.twitter.com/derGr1bjuq
This is not the first time Elizabeth Warren, a staunch critic of cryptocurrencies, has spearheaded attacks on the industryincluding bitcoin mining activities.
In July, the senator took aim against New York-based Bitcoin mining firm Greenidge Generation, raising concerns about the company’s impact on the environment.
Prior to that, Warren took to Twitter to state that “one of the easiest and least disruptive things we can do to fight the Climate Crisis is to crack down on environmentally wasteful cryptocurrencies.”
Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.